Author Archives: bonavada

About bonavada

Celebrating LGBTQ Culture, Empowering Queer Voices

You still sleeping on Carly Rae Jepsen?

Posted on by

In a world where pop music can often feel like a parade of one-hit wonders or cookie-cutter clones, Carly Rae Jepsen stands out as a truly fascinating anomaly. Her journey from a Canadian Idol also-ran to a beloved pop diva is a story of both triumph and a curious, almost charming, underachievement in the glittering hierarchy of pop stardom.

Jepsen’s rise to fame began in the most unexpected way—a third-place finish on Canadian Idol in 2007. But it was her 2011 single, “Call Me Maybe,” that catapulted her into the stratosphere. The track’s omnipresence in pop culture, having perched at the top of the Billboard Hot 100 for a staggering nine weeks and conquered charts in 19 countries, is a testament to its infectiousness. Rolling Stone hailed it as “one of the catchiest pop songs of the decade,” yet beneath the surface of this glittering success lies a narrative of pop ephemerality.

Jepsen’s debut album, Kiss, released in 2012, was a solid entry into the pop arena, debuting at No. 6 on the Billboard 200. It was certified Gold by the RIAA and offered up gems like “Goodbye” and “This Kiss,” marking her as a promising new talent. While PopMatters admired its fresh sound, The Guardian found it lacking in cohesion—a critique that hints at the uneven nature of her early work.

Her follow-up, Emotion (2015), is where Jepsen’s creative essence truly shines. This album, with its ‘80s synth-pop revival and emotional depth, earned praise from critics like NME and The New York Times. Yet, despite its critical acclaim and its place in pop discussions as a masterpiece, it only reached No. 16 on the Billboard 200—a modest position considering the acclaim it received.

Fast forward to 2019, and Jepsen’s Dedicated—her fourth studio album—debuted at No. 15 on the Billboard 200. It was praised as a “triumphant follow-up” to Emotion. The subsequent Dedicated Side B was celebrated by Pitchfork but viewed by some as less essential. This continuous output of quality music shows her dedication, yet the numbers reflect a curious inconsistency in commercial dominance.

Awards-wise, Jepsen has garnered notable recognition, including multiple Juno Awards. Her Grammy nominations highlight her industry impact, though they pale in comparison to the glittering array of accolades amassed by her pop peers. Her tours, while successful, lack the colossal scale of the major pop behemoths, underscoring a persistent gap between her critical success and commercial clout.

Amidst this, Carly Rae Jepsen’s engagement with her audience is commendable. Her vibrant social media presence and merchandise reflect her unique style and sustain a loyal fan base. But when compared to Taylor Swift’s empire—her genre-spanning appeal, record-breaking tours, and strategic marketing—Jepsen’s niche, retro-tinged pop doesn’t quite command the same broad, commercial fervor.

Now, let’s pivot to Jepsen’s relationship with the LGBTQ+ community, which is a testament to her genuine, heartfelt activism. Carly Rae Jepsen’s support for LGBTQ+ rights is unwavering and visible. In a 2012 interview with The Advocate, she expressed her belief in equal rights, emphasizing her commitment to supporting the LGBTQ+ community. Her involvement doesn’t stop at statements; she has performed at numerous LGBTQ+ pride events, including headlining the Los Angeles Pride festival in 2016.

Her music is a sanctuary for many within the LGBTQ+ community. Tracks like “Cut to the Feeling” and “Party for One” resonate with themes of self-love and liberation, making her a beacon of empowerment. The reception from LGBTQ+ fans highlights how Jepsen’s lyrics and persona offer a sense of belonging and affirmation.

Recognition from LGBTQ+ media, such as being named one of Out magazine’s “Most Stylish” stars, underscores her standing within the community. Her social media platforms, too, brim with supportive interactions and engagement from LGBTQ+ fans, showcasing the deep connection she has fostered. Her collaborations with LGBTQ+ advocates and her participation in events that promote LGBTQ+ visibility further solidify her status as a cherished ally.

In summary, Carly Rae Jepsen’s career is a fascinating blend of critical acclaim and commercial enigma. Her niche appeal, coupled with her dedicated LGBTQ+ following, paints a picture of a pop star whose influence, though profound, navigates a unique path in the world of music. While she may not possess the global dominance of Taylor Swift, Jepsen’s impact is felt deeply among those who appreciate her artistry and advocacy.

Joan Rivers: Bold, Unapologetic Comedy Pioneer

Posted on by

Darling, if there’s one thing Joan Rivers knew how to do, it was to grab life by the rhinestones and give it a good shake. Born on June 8, 1933, in Brooklyn, New York, Joan was the epitome of trailblazing. The early 1960s found her cracking jokes and barriers alike, her stand-up act as sharp as her famous shoulder pads.

Joan’s breakthrough came when she took the stage on “The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson.” Imagine the audacity! In 1973, she sashayed in as the first female guest host, and honey, that was just the beginning. This historic moment wasn’t just a feather in her cap; it was a whole peacock’s tail. It led to “The Joan Rivers Show,” a television escapade that ran from 1989 to 1993 and snagged her a Daytime Emmy Award. Oh, but she didn’t stop there. No, Joan made herself an icon in fashion commentary with “E! Fashion Police,” where her no-holds-barred critiques made headlines—and had everyone quaking in their couture.

Yet, behind the glam and the glitter, Joan’s life wasn’t always a walk down the red carpet. The tragic loss of her husband, Edgar Rosenberg, in 1987 left a void that she bravely navigated with candor. Her raw honesty about her personal battles endeared her to many, making her both relatable and resilient.

Now, let’s talk about Joan’s comedic approach, which was, let’s be honest, a bit like a rollercoaster designed by Salvador Dalí. Her humor, while groundbreaking, was also a lightning rod for controversy. Joan was known for her razor-sharp celebrity jabs. Her quips about Elizabeth Taylor’s marital escapades or the fashion faux pas of the rich and famous were sometimes as biting as her bejeweled microphone. And don’t get me started on her jokes about sex and gender—those were the sort that left some people clutching their pearls and others roaring with laughter.

Of course, Joan had her critics. Some thought her jokes about sensitive topics—like 9/11 or the Holocaust—were in the poorest taste, while others were taken aback by her comments on race and gender. Yet, Joan was a staunch defender of her style, insisting that comedy should be a free-for-all, a place where boundaries are meant to be pushed.

In the realm of praise, Joan had her cheerleaders, too. Johnny Carson, despite their complicated history, recognized her talent, saying she had an “ability to communicate and be funny in a way that is rare.” David Letterman also applauded her fearlessness, noting she was “brave and brilliant.”

However, the criticism didn’t exactly skip past her. David Edelstein remarked that Joan’s willingness to cross lines often landed her in “uncomfortable territory,” and Ben Brantley from the New York Times noted that her bravado could sometimes come off as plain old meanness.

But let’s not forget the legacy Joan left behind. Despite the controversies, she was a pioneer for female comedians. Her daughter, Melissa Rivers, put it perfectly: “My mother broke so many barriers.” And following her death in 2014, even President Obama paid tribute, acknowledging Joan as a “pioneer in comedy” whose “bold humor and unflinching honesty will be remembered.”

And darling, here’s a delightful tidbit from “Joan Rivers: A Piece of Work”: Joan once faced off with a designer known for avant-garde fashion that looked like it had been designed in a kaleidoscope. As the designer braced for Rivers’ critique, Joan took one look and quipped, “I’ve seen better designs come out of a blindfolded paint-by-numbers kit.” The designer, shocked yet composed, took it in stride, and Joan, ever the master of the jibe, added, “Fashion is all about making statements, and you’ve certainly made one. Let’s just hope it’s not a call to the fashion police!”

This anecdote encapsulates Joan’s knack for mixing humor with a hefty dose of honesty, keeping both audiences and designers on their toes. Joan Rivers was a force of nature—part genius, part provocateur, and all fabulous. Her legacy, like her humor, will always spark conversation, a testament to a woman who truly lived and laughed larger than life.

Polari: The Code of Gay Resilience and Identity.

Posted on by

In the grand theatre of linguistic evolution, Polari emerges not as a mere historical artifact but as a vivid emblem of the LGBTQ+ community’s enduring spirit. From its murky inception in the shadowed alleys of early 20th-century Britain, Polari became a beacon of defiance and solidarity, a coded lexicon crafted under the harsh glare of societal repression. This was no mere assortment of slang; it was a lifeline, a covert means of communication for a world where the mere hint of one’s true self could lead to dire consequences. With its eclectic blend of Italian, Romani, Cockney rhyming slang, and British English, Polari served as both shield and sanctuary, allowing its users to navigate a hostile landscape with remarkable panache.

Polari’s origins are steeped in a unique linguistic alchemy. It emerged out of necessity, a quilt of words enabling LGBTQ+ individuals to converse about their identities and desires without courting unwanted scrutiny. More than a survival tool, Polari was a sophisticated form of discourse, a way to speak openly about one’s private life in a public sphere that was often unforgiving. The charm of Polari lies in its playful vocabulary—terms like “bona,” signifying something or someone attractive, “varda,” meaning to look, and “lallies,” a cheeky term for legs. These words were not mere euphemisms but reflections of a community that, despite adversity, embraced life with a flourish of style and humor. The term “camp,” for example, transcends mere theatricality to embody a flamboyant, almost defiant embrace of personal expression.

Yet, Polari’s legacy extends far beyond its own lexicon. It represents a broader tradition of LGBTQ+ slang, each term encapsulating various facets of the community’s experiences and struggles. From the once-derogatory “fruit” to the reclaimed “pansy,” these words are emblematic of the ever-evolving nature of LGBTQ+ identity and resilience. They mirror a dynamic interplay between societal rejection and internal solidarity, showcasing how language can serve as both weapon and refuge.

Though Polari may no longer grace everyday conversation with the frequency it once did, it remains a poignant artifact of cultural history. It stands as a testament to the ingenuity and defiance of a community that refused to be silenced. In modern media and academic circles, Polari is not merely a historical curiosity but a vibrant symbol of LGBTQ+ heritage. It graces exhibitions and scholarly discussions, a living reminder of how marginalized voices carved out a space for themselves against overwhelming odds.

In today’s world, as LGBTQ+ slang increasingly permeates mainstream culture, there exists a delicate tension between retaining the original, nuanced meanings of these terms and their broader, more generic applications. Words like “fabulous” and “shade,” once deeply embedded in LGBTQ+ vernacular, risk losing their distinctiveness as they become part of everyday language. This transition underscores the challenge of balancing community pride with the inevitable broadening of cultural influence, preserving the richness of LGBTQ+ expressions even as they gain widespread popularity.

Polari’s origins, with their rich blend of Romani, Italian, and Cockney influences, highlight a broader trend of linguistic creativity within marginalized communities. It was not just a means of survival but a subtle form of subversion against societal norms. Its popularity, buoyed by British entertainment like Round the Horne and its memorable characters, Julian and Sandy, introduced Polari to a wider audience. This comedic yet respectful portrayal preserved the essence of Polari while illuminating its historical significance.

Polari was more than a language; it was a foundation for community and solidarity. It allowed LGBTQ+ individuals to create a shared identity and communicate in ways that were both private and affirming. It was a testament to their ability to reclaim power and assert their identity in a society that often sought to marginalize or erase them. Recent revivals of Polari underscore its ongoing relevance, highlighting its contribution to LGBTQ+ cultural heritage.

As social media continues to shape the evolution of LGBTQ+ slang, new terms emerge, perpetuating the tradition of linguistic innovation and community-building. While these contemporary terms may lack Polari’s historical weight, they continue the legacy of creativity and self-expression that Polari exemplified. In a world where LGBTQ+ language is increasingly mainstream, the challenge remains to preserve the depth and context of these expressions while celebrating their expanded reach.

In sum, Polari’s influence on LGBTQ+ culture and media extends far beyond its historical roots, permeating drag performance, literature, and global queer vernacular. Its revival and continued study underscore its enduring significance, while personal anecdotes and historical contexts enrich our understanding of its role in shaping queer identity and expression. Polari remains a vibrant testament to the resilience and creativity of the LGBTQ+ community, a language that continues to inspire and inform even as it evolves and adapts.