A Silence Too Loud: Will Young’s Battle for Truth Against a Prestigious Prep School

Will Young, the pop star whose velvet voice and winsome smile captured the hearts of millions, has never shied away from tough conversations. But there’s one conversation he refuses to stop having, no matter who it upsets. It’s a conversation about trauma, silence, and the complicity of those who should have protected him and others. It’s about the abuse he endured at his prestigious prep school and the chilling attempts to silence him when he began speaking out.

When Will began to talk publicly about the abuse he suffered, he was met not with compassion, but with a callous request to keep quiet. The school reached out to his manager, urging Will to stop discussing his past because it was “upsetting the parents.” This attempt to stifle his voice only fueled his resolve. “I will never stop talking about this,” he declared, fully aware of the discomfort his words might cause.

Will’s anger isn’t just for himself. It’s for all those who, like his late brother, suffered in silence, their mental health deteriorating until there was no way out. His brother’s tragic death was, in part, a consequence of the torment he endured at the same school. This is a wound that will never fully heal, but Will’s response has been one of relentless advocacy, not revenge. He’s fighting for those who couldn’t fight for themselves.

The boarding school system, with its archaic practices and deep-seated culture of corporal punishment, is a significant part of the problem. Such practices were shockingly legal until the 90s, and the repercussions are still being felt today. The pain, the neglect, the abuse—it’s all left scars that many, like Will, are still grappling with decades later.

When Will sought legal action, he encountered another layer of betrayal. The law firm he approached refused to take on his case, suggesting it wasn’t winnable. The school never even bothered to respond to his allegations. For over a year, they remained silent, likely hoping he would go away. But they underestimated his determination. The harder they tried to silence him, the louder he became.

Will’s fight is not just about his own story; it’s about validating the experiences of others who have been through similar horrors. It’s about saying that what happened was not just wrong—it was profoundly unjust. And it’s about making sure that others know they have the right to speak out, to seek justice, and to demand accountability.

This battle hasn’t been without its toll. Will speaks openly about the strain it’s put on his relationships, particularly with those who were closely tied to the school. Family members who were once aligned with the institution have had to grapple with the harsh truths he’s revealed. Some have supported him, while others have distanced themselves, unable or unwilling to confront the uncomfortable reality.

But Will refuses to carry the burden of their discomfort. He knows that their reactions are theirs to manage, just as his are his own. He’s come to a place of acceptance—acknowledging that while the past has left a gaping hole in him, he’s done the work to heal and move forward. And in doing so, he’s chosen not to live a life defined by revenge or anger, but by truth and empowerment.

Will Young’s story is a powerful reminder of the courage it takes to speak out, especially against powerful institutions. It’s about refusing to be silenced, no matter the cost, and about using one’s voice not just to heal oneself, but to inspire and protect others. His journey is far from over, but his message is clear: the truth will not be buried, no matter how much it might make others squirm.

Nadia Almada reflects on her groundbreaking Big Brother win 20 years later.


Nadia Almada reflects on her groundbreaking Big Brother win 20 years later. It’s been 20 years since she sashayed into the Big Brother house, unaware that she was about to become an icon. Nadia’s victory wasn’t just a win; it was a moment that captured the hearts of millions and put her face on every magazine cover in the land. The show, known for its tears, tantrums, and laugh-out-loud moments, had never seen anything like her.

As she sits down to reflect on that life-changing moment, Nadia is both nostalgic and candid. “I didn’t think I’d last a week, let alone win,” she says, still somewhat incredulous at the memory. But win she did, and it wasn’t just the UK that celebrated her triumph. Back in Portugal, her homeland, she was hailed as a heroine. The adoration was overwhelming, yet Nadia’s humility remained intact. She had entered the house with a singular hope: to be accepted for who she was, nothing more, nothing less.

And who could forget the iconic “Fight Night”? Before the Real Housewives were flipping tables, Nadia was making her mark with a level of sass that only she could pull off. It was a time of emotional freedom for her, a rare liberation within the confines of a “prison made of cardboard,” as she puts it. Looking back, she’s struck by how free she felt, both emotionally and spiritually—a stark contrast to the struggles she faced before entering the house.

Now, two decades on, Nadia has a few apologies to make. Not to anyone else, but to herself. She speaks of a time when she hid away parts of who she was, when she felt the need to lock away the woman who won Big Brother in a metaphorical attic. “I didn’t even wrap her in a beautiful cushion,” she admits with a rueful smile. But time and maturity have brought her to a place of acceptance. “I’m embracing a different strength now,” she says, and it shows.

The conversation shifts to why she chose to keep her gender identity a secret from her housemates. Would she do the same today? Absolutely. “It’s nobody’s business,” she asserts. In those days, being a transgender woman was something society forced you to hide. Nadia wanted to be seen as just another young woman, full of life, rather than a walking label.

So, have things progressed in the last 20 years? Nadia is clear-eyed and unflinching: the conversation around transgender issues has become increasingly toxic. The discourse, she says, has become “political” in the worst sense of the word, with more focus on dissecting identities than on seeing the humanity behind them. But through it all, she remains a proud feminist, advocating for autonomy and equality, despite the contradictions society tries to impose on her.

As for life after Big Brother, it wasn’t all glitz and glamour. When the limelight dimmed, Nadia had to carve out a new path for herself. She found it in hairdressing, training with one of the most prestigious names in the industry. It was a far cry from reality TV, but it was a career that she built with her own hands, proving once again that Nadia Almada is a force to be reckoned with.

Two decades on, Nadia is still here, still fabulous, and still fighting—only now, she’s doing it on her own terms.

Sugar Rush: The Bold, Unapologetic Triumph of Teenage Angst

Sugar Rush is one of those shows that seems to have arrived ahead of its time, like a pair of flared trousers making a surprise comeback at a fashion show. Channel 4, in its infinite wisdom and occasional flashes of brilliance, gave us this deliciously gritty gem between 2005 and 2006. Adapted from Julie Burchill’s novel, it was a cheeky, no-holds-barred dive into the tumultuous sea of teenage emotions, sexuality, and friendship. This wasn’t just another teen drama; it was a neon-soaked rollercoaster through the choppy waters of adolescent self-discovery, complete with a heart that beat loudly for LGBTQ+ representation when such things were still a novelty.

At the heart of this vibrant chaos is Kim Daniels, a 15-year-old whirlwind played with endearing intensity by Olivia Hallinan. Kim is our guide through the glitter and grime of Brighton, grappling with a crush on her best friend, Maria “Sugar” Sweet. Lenora Crichlow’s Sugar is everything Kim isn’t—wild, carefree, and utterly oblivious to the storm she’s creating in Kim’s heart. Watching Kim’s struggle is like watching a car crash in slow motion, a mix of painful and impossible to look away from.

As the plot thickens, we meet Saint in the second season, a DJ and sex shop owner with the kind of swagger that could make even the most stoic heart race. Played by Sarah-Jane Potts, Saint introduces a new flavour to Kim’s journey, giving her a fresh perspective and, perhaps, a new chance at love. Saint’s arrival isn’t just a plot twist; it’s a lifeline for Kim, as she navigates the tangled web of her emotions and desires.

The show bravely tackles the messy business of teenage life with a blend of humour and harsh reality, unafraid to dive into themes like societal pressure, identity crises, and the often brutal quest for self-acceptance. Kim’s unrequited love for Sugar is not just a plot device but a mirror reflecting the complexities of young love and the often painful journey of self-discovery.

It’s impossible not to be struck by the way “Sugar Rush” balances its comedic moments with deeply dramatic ones. There’s a standout scene where Kim receives a distressing call from Sugar, covered in blood—a moment that encapsulates the show’s unique ability to shift gears from light-hearted antics to serious drama without missing a beat.

Critically, “Sugar Rush” didn’t just make a splash; it created waves. It won an International Emmy for Children and Young People and was BAFTA-nominated, accolades that underscore its impact and the resonance it found with audiences. It was a pioneering force in LGBTQ+ representation, offering a refreshing and necessary perspective when such portrayals were sparse and often handled with a delicate touch.

Sadly, as often happens with the best of things, “Sugar Rush” was cut short after just two seasons. Its cancellation was a blow to fans and cast members, but its legacy endures. For many, it was a crucial touchstone, providing a voice and visibility to young LGBTQ+ people navigating their own personal mazes. Its legacy endures as a treasured artifact in the annals of television history, with its fearless storytelling and role in pushing the envelope on what mainstream media could portray being remembered.

In the grand tapestry of television, “Sugar Rush” stands out as a vibrant, bold patch, its colours as bright and unapologetic as ever. It remains a testament to the power of storytelling to reflect, challenge, and ultimately change how we see ourselves and each other.

“Deadpool 3: The Misguided Quest for LGBTQ+ Credibility in Spandex”

Deadpool’s Whimsy vs. Marvel’s LGBTQ+ Milestones

Last month, Deadpool 3 made its grand debut with Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman back in action, aiming to rejuvenate the Marvel Cinematic Universe, which has been grappling with superhero fatigue and declining box office returns. The film’s attempt to rekindle excitement, reminiscent of the buzz surrounding Spider-Man’s multiverse encounter in Spider-Man: No Way Home, brought together Deadpool’s irreverent humour and Wolverine’s brooding allure. However, the film’s treatment of humour, particularly in relation to LGBTQ+ themes, has sparked mixed reactions.

The marketing campaign for Deadpool 3 hinged on a singular, and at times tiresome, gag: Deadpool’s exaggerated infatuation with Wolverine. From the very first poster, which depicted Deadpool and Wolverine’s masks as parts of a broken heart necklace with the tagline “come together,” it was clear that the film was leaning heavily into a joke about their supposed romantic connection. This imagery, reminiscent of outdated internet humour, suggested a bromance with a twist that felt more like a throwback to less enlightened times.

Deadpool’s humour, characterised by its boundary-pushing and self-aware nature, might seem well-suited to handling irreverent jokes about his own pansexuality. The film’s running gag about Deadpool’s flirtatious advances towards Wolverine fits within his established persona of absurdity and meta-commentary. For fans, these jokes might represent a continuation of Deadpool’s cheeky humour, mixing absurdity with playful jabs at traditional masculinity.

However, this approach has not been without its critics. Observers have noted that while the sexualized bromance is not overtly homophobic, it leans into tired stereotypes. The humour often relies on the premise that close male friendships must romanticize, implying that men expressing affection is inherently comedic. This reliance on such clichés risks reducing the complexity of male relationships to mere punchlines, potentially coming off as outdated or insensitive.

In contrast, Marvel’s handling of LGBTQ+ characters like Iceman, Hulkling, and Wiccan provides a more substantial and nuanced representation. Iceman, one of the original X-Men created by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby, was revealed as gay in 2015’s All-New X-Men #40. This development added a profound layer to Bobby Drake’s character, offering a relatable and thoughtful portrayal of self-acceptance and personal growth. Iceman’s coming out story represents a significant milestone in LGBTQ+ representation within mainstream comics, showcasing a mature and impactful exploration of identity.

Similarly, Hulkling, introduced in Young Avengers #1 in 2005, is known for his superhuman strength and shapeshifting abilities. As an openly gay character, Hulkling’s relationship with Wiccan has become one of Marvel’s most prominent LGBTQ+ romances. Their partnership adds depth to both characters and highlights a loving and complex relationship within the superhero genre, contributing significantly to positive LGBTQ+ representation.

Wiccan, also introduced in Young Avengers #1, is a powerful magic user and the son of the Scarlet Witch. The comic portrays his openly gay identity and relationship with Hulkling with nuance and affection, positively depicting LGBTQ+ love and identity. The portrayal of Wiccan’s romance with Hulkling enriches Marvel’s roster of characters, providing readers with a meaningful exploration of love and super-heroism.

While Deadpool 3 may entertain with its whimsical and exaggerated humour, particularly regarding LGBTQ+ themes, it achieves this by being irreverent. Deadpool’s brand of comedy, rooted in pushing boundaries and eliciting laughs, contrasts sharply with the more respectful and impactful portrayals of LGBTQ+ characters like Iceman, Hulkling, and Wiccan.

The Uncompromising Legacy of Queer as Folk: 25 Years On

The Uncompromising Legacy of Queer as Folk: 25 Years On

Ah, 1999. The year of Tony Blair’s still-shiny premiership, Y2K panic, and Queer as Folk, a show so unapologetically audacious that it seemed to smack the British public across the face with its unvarnished depiction of gay life. It was as if Russell T. Davies decided that if TV was going to tell gay stories, it wasn’t going to tiptoe around with tea and biscuits—it was going to shout about it in all its messy, sexy, gloriously chaotic glory.

It wasn’t exactly a gentle climate for a show like Queer as Folk to waltz onto our screens. The age of consent for gay men was still being thrashed out in Parliament, and Section 28, that ghastly bit of legislation banning “promotion of homosexuality” in schools, was still stinking up the statute books. But in the midst of this, Davies, with the brazen audacity of a man who’s seen enough polite repression to last a lifetime, birthed a show that was anything but polite.

Canal Street, Manchester’s queer epicentre, was the backdrop for the story of three men navigating a world of thumping basslines, snogging in dark corners, and, yes, rimming on the first date. This wasn’t just another drama to be tucked away in the post-watershed hours; this was a celebration, an unflinching portrayal of gay life that made no apologies for its explicitness. And oh, did it ruffle feathers.

The casting process for this game-changing show was as fraught with nerves as you’d expect. Aidan Gillen, Craig Kelly, and a pre-Sons of Anarchy Charlie Hunnam stepped into roles that would come to define them, and, in some cases, haunt them. Kelly, in particular, nearly walked away from it all—”gay porn” was how some of his fellow actors sneered at it—but instead, he went on to embody Vince, the shy, sweet, and sexually tentative heart of the show.

And then there was Hunnam, barely out of his teens, and walking onto the set with the kind of raw magnetism that made everyone in the room pray he could act. He could, of course, and as Nathan, he electrified the screen—a beautiful, brazen 15-year-old exploring the world with a mix of awe and reckless abandon.

Davies knew exactly what he was doing when he made Nathan so young. It was a choice that could have ended the show before it started, in a cloud of outrage and moral panic. But Davies wasn’t about to create a queer show that played by the rules of straight respectability. Nathan wasn’t just a character; he was a mirror for a whole generation of young gay men who were discovering their sexuality in a world that still wanted them to feel ashamed.

The sex scenes were notorious—and rightly so. While other shows might throw in a bit of nudity for titillation, Queer as Folk made sex integral to the story, exposing both the thrill and the complexity of desire. Aidan Gillen’s Stuart, cool and aloof, rimmed Nathan in the first episode, a moment that still reverberates through TV history for its audacity. But it wasn’t just about shock; it was about showing a sexual act that wasn’t even on most people’s radar, pushing the boundaries of what TV could depict, and what audiences could accept.

Critics, predictably, clutched their pearls. The press largely ignored the show in the run-up to its debut—until it aired, at which point the gloves came off. Stonewall and other gay rights groups condemned it for not being responsible enough, for daring to show gay men having fun, falling in love, and—heaven forbid—having sex without an educational pamphlet on HIV slipping out of their pockets. Meanwhile, the gay scene in Manchester was torn between pride and indignation, with some regulars on Canal Street muttering that the show had set them back decades.

Yet despite—or perhaps because of—the controversy, Queer as Folk left an indelible mark on British television. It was a show that refused to behave, that insisted on showing gay life as it was—messy, joyful, tragic, and yes, sometimes crude. And while the actors have gone on to varied careers, from Hollywood blockbusters to voiceovers that paid the mortgage, they all carry a piece of Queer as Folk with them. It wasn’t just a show; it was a lightning bolt that lit up the dark, showing a generation of queer people that their lives, their loves, and their stories were worth telling—loudly, unapologetically, and without a hint of shame.

And as for the possibility of a reunion? Well, Davies might dismiss the idea with a wave of the hand and a quip about middle-aged men, but the legacy of Queer as Folk is too potent to ever really fade. It’s a touchstone, a reminder of a time when television dared to push boundaries, and when a group of brave actors and creators decided that the world needed to see gay life as it was—not as a cautionary tale, but as a celebration. Perhaps it’s time to light that spark again.

Yorkshire’s Own Heart: God’s Own Country Finds Love in the Mud

People have tagged God’s Own Country as “Yorkshire’s Brokeback Mountain,” but honestly, that’s like calling a fine single malt just another whisky. Sure, they’re both love stories between men in the rugged countryside, but Francis Lee’s film digs its muddy boots into the Yorkshire soil and refuses to be neatly pigeonholed.

The Yorkshire countryside is as much a character here as the humans trudging through it—beautiful, yes, but also brutal, a place where the landscape mirrors the loneliness that hangs in the air like a damp mist. “It’s beautiful here,” one character muses, taking in the rolling hills and moody skies, before delivering the kicker, “But lonely, no?” And there it is, the melancholy heart of God’s Own Country, beating quietly beneath the surface.

Enter Johnny Saxby, played by Josh O’Connor with the kind of brooding intensity that makes you want to give him a hug—if only you thought he wouldn’t shove you off in disgust. Johnny’s life is all early mornings, mud-caked boots, and the relentless grind of keeping the family farm afloat. His father’s gruff and his nan’s as weathered as the stone walls that crisscross the hills, and Johnny himself is spiraling into a pit of loneliness, booze, and furtive hookups that leave him as cold as the Yorkshire drizzle.

One of those hookups happens in a cattle truck with a vet, and it’s as quick and unromantic as you’d expect. This is not a man looking for love; he’s looking for an escape, even if it’s just for a few minutes. Romance? Johnny practically recoils at the thought, his life too entrenched in hardship to allow for anything as frivolous as feelings.

And then along comes Gheorghe, a Romanian farmhand who’s here to help out but ends up doing a lot more than just mending fences. Johnny greets Gheorghe with a spiky hostility, laced with the kind of casual racism that’s as much about self-loathing as it is about anything else. But up in the hills, away from prying eyes, something shifts. The mud, the cold, the hard labor—they all start to dissolve as Johnny and Gheorghe’s relationship moves from grudging respect to something deeper, something that feels like warmth in the otherwise unforgiving landscape.

Their first encounter is rough, primal, and covered in mud, yet somehow it carries the weight of something far more tender. Back at the farm, their relationship continues in secret, a series of stolen moments and loaded glances that speak volumes. There’s a restraint here, an Englishness, if you will, that’s more Brief Encounter than Brokeback Mountain. This isn’t all about grand declarations of love; it’s about the quiet, almost imperceptible shifts in a man who’s spent his life shutting everyone out.

And while this love story unfolds, the farm work doesn’t stop. The drudgery of agricultural life in Britain today is unflinchingly portrayed—this is not the romanticized countryside of picture postcards. When Johnny’s father suffers a stroke, leaving the future of the farm in Johnny’s hands, O’Connor delivers a gut-punch of a performance. You see the realization dawn on him that he’s staring down a lifetime of back-breaking labor, and for a moment, it’s as though all the air has been sucked out of the room.

Yet, amid the grit and the graft, there’s something undeniably hopeful about God’s Own Country. It’s in the tentative romance between Johnny and Gheorghe, in the way they slowly, carefully, let each other in. It’s in the moments of quiet connection, as rare and precious as a ray of sunshine piercing through the relentless grey of a Yorkshire spring. This isn’t just a British Brokeback Mountain—it’s a film that stands on its own, unflinching in its portrayal of rural life, yet quietly, achingly romantic at its core.

A Trans Man Walks Into A Gay Bar: Navigating Love, Identity, and the Unknown

On the bookshelves, there’s a growing library of what it means to be gay and an increasingly rich tapestry of tales about the trans experience. But what if you exist in that hazy, uncharted territory where these identities overlap? It seemed there wasn’t a guidebook for the longest time.

Then came Harry Nicholas with A Trans Man Walks Into A Gay Bar. Freshly single after a five-year relationship, Harry found himself thrust into the daunting world of singlehood. But this wasn’t your run-of-the-mill breakup blues. Harry was navigating life as a transmasculine, newly out gay man. The breakup felt right, but the aftermath was nothing short of terrifying. How do you step into the shoes of a gay man when you’re still figuring out what it means to be a man? Would the gay community welcome him with open arms or turn a cold shoulder? And then there was the question of gay sex—what would that even be like? Most pressing of all: Was love still within reach?

In this raw, intimate, and unflinchingly honest account, Harry pulls back the curtain on his journey through the vibrant, often bewildering world of contemporary gay culture. From swiping through Grindr and stumbling into gay bars to the steamy haze of saunas and the heart-stopping possibility of love, Harry’s story is a fearless exploration of identity, desire, and self-discovery. It’s a brave, uplifting journey that shines a light on the joy found in becoming who you truly are.

Critics have largely praised A Trans Man Walks Into A Gay Bar for its unfiltered look at the challenges and triumphs of navigating gay culture as a transmasculine man. The book has been lauded for its raw honesty, unique perspective, and its contribution to LGBTQ+ literature. Reviewers appreciate Nicholas’s ability to handle complex issues with sensitivity, offering a narrative that fills a significant gap in representation. While some note that the book may not delve as deeply into certain aspects as one might hope, reviewers widely recognise it as a vital and uplifting addition to contemporary queer literature.

Thank Goodness for Miriam Margolyes: The Unfiltered Queen of Chaos

There’s something utterly irresistible about Miriam Margolyes, and it’s not just her knack for dropping F-bombs on live TV or her unfiltered, jaw-dropping anecdotes. In an entertainment world overrun by meticulously polished, PR-approved clones, Margolyes is a gloriously unfiltered beacon of chaos. Her charm? It’s her gleeful refusal to conform—an anarchist’s delight in an industry that worships decorum.

Take, for instance, her views on her love life: “I’ve had sex with almost all of the women I’ve met. Why not? I enjoyed it, and so did they.” Who else but Miriam would say that? Or the time she met Martin Scorsese and brazenly told him, “You’re the only man I’d leave my girlfriend for.” Her boldness isn’t limited to the bedroom, either. When Prince Charles asked what she did, she didn’t hesitate: “I told him I was the best reader of smut in the world, and he looked a bit shocked.” And that’s the beauty of Margolyes—she’ll say what we’re all thinking, or more likely, what we wouldn’t dare to think.

But it’s not just the shock value that makes Margolyes so compelling. Beneath the salty language and eyebrow-raising comments, there’s an undeniable warmth, a sense that she genuinely loves life in all its messy, unpredictable glory. She’s the rare public figure who seems to be living her life, not curating it for Instagram. When she talks about being cast in Harry Potter, she quips, “I was delighted to be Professor Sprout. She’s a fat, jolly woman—a bit like me, minus the jolly.” It’s this kind of disarming self-awareness that makes her not just a character, but a deeply relatable one.

And let’s not forget her take on weight loss: “I’ve always been fat. I can’t say I like it, but I don’t have the willpower to change it. The only exercise I get is when I serve other people.” In a world obsessed with body image and fitness fads, Margolyes’ honesty is a breath of fresh air. She’s the anti-celebrity celebrity, a woman who’s managed to stay relevant by being unapologetically, unrepentantly herself.

Miriam Margolyes has become a national treasure not in spite of her unruliness, but because of it. In an age of relentless self-promotion and carefully managed personas, her chaotic authenticity is incredibly refreshing. Honestly, in a world of beige, thank goodness for a splash of Miriam Margolyes.

Jade Thirlwall’s Angel Of My Dreams Shatters Pop’s Boundaries.

Jade Thirlwall has officially said goodbye to playing it safe, and thank goodness for that. Angel Of My Dreams isn’t just a debut; it’s a riotous pop explosion that makes you sit up and mutter, “What the actual…?” It’s like Jade took all the bottled-up energy from Little Mix’s wildest moments, shook it up like a can of fizzy pop, and let it burst out in a technicolor spectacle of sound.

Let’s not mince words here—Little Mix were a force of nature, a pop juggernaut that dominated the UK charts and stages for a solid decade. When they called it a day in 2022, there was an undeniable void. The solo ventures that followed? A mixed bag, to say the least. But then comes Jade, sweeping in with her debut single Angel Of My Dreams, and suddenly, all bets are off.

This isn’t just a song; it’s a three-minute adrenaline rush that defies pop’s typical boundaries. Think of it as an album’s worth of ideas, squashed into one gloriously chaotic package. Crafted in the studios of Los Angeles with Steph Jones and Pablo Bowman, and produced by the ever-brilliant Mike Sabath, the track has Jade front and center—no backup, no distractions, just pure, unfiltered Thirlwall. She’s the driving force here, and boy, does she drive hard.

Now, let’s talk about that music video. Eleven costume changes? Filming surreal scenes on the streets of East London? It’s a full-blown visual feast that perfectly matches the audacity of the track. Jade isn’t just dipping a toe into the waters of solo stardom; she’s doing a cannonball into the deep end, and she’s making waves.

In a world where pop can often feel like it’s playing by the rules, Jade has scrawled her name in giant, glittery letters across the rulebook and then promptly tossed it aside. She’s not here for “nice”; she’s here to make you wonder what just hit you. As she herself puts it, Angel Of My Dreams is a “huge pop punch to the face,” and honestly? It’s exactly what we needed.

In an era where pop is sometimes too careful, Jade Thirlwall has arrived to remind us all that chaos, color, and creativity are still alive and well. And thank heavens for that.

Directed by Charlie Di Placido, the video for Angel Of My Dreams is a kaleidoscopic adventure through East London, with Jade at the center of it all. From the moment the video begins, it’s clear that this isn’t just another pop release. Jade is playing with imagery, symbolism, and a sense of nostalgia that’s deeply personal yet universally relatable.

One of the standout moments in the video is a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it reference to Jade’s Little Mix days. For longtime fans, the video is a treasure trove of memories—tiny details that call back to the iconic group’s decade-long reign in the pop world. It’s a subtle but powerful way for Jade to acknowledge where she’s come from while also signaling where she’s headed next.

But it’s not just about the past. The video is also a celebration of the future, with Jade confidently stepping into new territory. The visual style is both dreamy and edgy, blending surreal elements with a gritty, urban backdrop. Costume changes galore and dynamic scenes keep the energy high throughout, reflecting the frenetic pace of the song itself.

And then there are the Easter eggs—little hidden gems scattered throughout the video that offer deeper meaning to the imagery. Whether it’s a symbolic gesture, a piece of wardrobe that has a story behind it, or a scene that feels like it’s straight out of a dream, every frame of Angel Of My Dreams is carefully crafted to tell a story that goes beyond the lyrics.

Jade herself has said that she wanted her debut single to make a statement, and with Angel Of My Dreams, she’s done exactly that. It’s a bold, unapologetic introduction to Jade Thirlwall, the solo artist—one who isn’t afraid to push boundaries, challenge expectations, and create something truly unique.

In a music industry that often values conformity, Jade’s Angel Of My Dreams video is a breath of fresh air. It’s not just a visual accompaniment to a song; it’s an artistic statement in its own right, full of layers and meaning that invite multiple viewings. For Jade, this is just the beginning, and if Angel Of My Dreams is any indication, her solo career is going to be one hell of a ride.

Call Me by Your Name and the Art of Longing

Call Me by Your Name isn’t just a film; it’s a visceral experience that seeps into your bones, leaving you giddy, heartbroken, and utterly breathless. Luca Guadagnino has crafted a cinematic seduction, where every frame pulses with the ache of first love, the kind that makes you feel alive in a way nothing else can. And let’s be clear: this isn’t just any love story—it’s a full-bodied, unapologetically erotic dive into the deep end of desire. But it’s the kind of eroticism that’s about more than just sex. It’s about that intoxicating mix of passion and torment, where love feels like a freefall off a cliff, and you’re loving every terrifying second of it.

Timothée Chalamet and Armie Hammer, bless them, don’t just act—they are Elio and Oliver, drawing us into their sun-drenched world somewhere in northern Italy, circa 1983. The summer air is thick with the scent of ripening fruit and impending heartache. Elio, all sharp edges and youthful arrogance, doesn’t stand a chance against Oliver’s easy American confidence. Oliver is the kind of man who walks into a room and owns it, leaving everyone else, including Elio, scrambling to catch up. You can practically feel Elio’s world tilt off its axis the moment Oliver arrives, shattering soft-boiled eggs with a hunger that’s as much about life as it is about breakfast.

Their chemistry isn’t immediate fireworks—it’s a slow burn, one that Guadagnino nurtures with the patience of a master, until it explodes in a blaze of forbidden passion. But this isn’t just about two men falling in love; it’s about the unbearable intensity of that first, all-consuming love that leaves you raw and wrecked, but somehow better for it. By the time Elio’s mother is reading him some ancient French tale about knights and princesses, you’re practically screaming at the screen, “Just say it, Elio! Speak, or die!”

And when Elio finally does, it’s as though the entire film breathes out, even as you hold your breath for the inevitable heartbreak. Guadagnino doesn’t just make you watch Elio’s longing; he makes you feel it in your gut, in the flutter of pages in the breeze, the cool splash of water in a stone pool, the almost unbearable beauty of young bodies bathed in Italian sunlight. This film is longing, dripping with it, steeped in it, until you’re drowning in its bittersweet depths.

Call Me by Your Name isn’t shy about its influences, either. There’s a reason Oliver asks Elio to “call me by your name, and I’ll call you by mine,” echoing those ancient Greek myths about soulmates, torn apart and condemned to spend their lives searching for their other halves. And when they find each other? Well, it’s like Guadagnino has captured lightning in a bottle, a raw, electric connection that feels primal, eternal, and oh so fragile.

But let’s not kid ourselves: this paradise isn’t built to last. The film knows it, Elio knows it, and deep down, we all know it. The Edenic bliss of their summer romance is always tinged with the knowledge that it’s all too fleeting, a bright, burning comet destined to flame out. Yet, that’s what makes it so damn beautiful.

In the end, Call Me by Your Name is about more than just a gay romance; it’s about what it means to be alive, to truly feel, to embrace the joy and the sorrow in equal measure. Elio’s father nails it when he tells his son not to crush the pain, because with it comes the joy. Guadagnino doesn’t want you to just watch his film—he wants you to live it, to let it pierce your heart and leave a scar. And that, my friends, is why Call Me by Your Name isn’t just a movie. It’s a masterpiece.